What have you experienced?

• Let's try to remember what has happened in PV168
• What do you think about the real purpose of all that?

Programming is hard

• It's not that difficult to fulfill
  • compiler's rules
  • current requirements
• However, it's a completely different game
  • when other people are involved
  • and requirements evolve over time

Essential vs. Accidental Complexity

• Essential complexity is integral part of the problem
  • cannot be eliminated completely
  • can only be minimized
• Accidental complexity is what we add to the problem
  • by using inefficient tools
  • by using inefficient methodologies
  • by obscuring the intent in the code

Naming things is hard

• Good names reveal the intent (semantics)
  • not the data type used (e.g. listEvent)
  • not the physical position (e.g. northPanel)
• Good names lie in the problem domain
  • not in the solution domain (Computer Science "jargon")
• Naming things remain hard
  • even for masters
• Naming is an incremental process

Structure matters

• The same problem can typically be represented in many different forms
• Some of them are better than the others
• Deciphering bad structure is not what you want to do

Interactions with PMs are tough

• Nothing is as evident/unambiguous as demos
  • misunderstanding are clearly identifiable
  • corrective actions can be planned
• It's better to demo
  • less functionality but actually working
  • stuff you know why it's there
• "When in doubt, leave it out" (Josh Bloch)
  • missing things are easy to spot

Functionality vs. Graphics

• Functionality is important to have first
• Graphics is also important but not at first
  • investing into it too early is typically waste
  • developers are seldom good visual designers

Duplicity is the Root of all Evil

• Similarity is not necessarily duplicity
• Magic numbers and string literals are almost always evil
  • in production code you have to use constants
  • however, in tests the situation is different
• Repeated code blocks of the same semantics are always evil

Refactoring is hard

• We need to have solid test suite in order to do it safely
• Keeping increments small is tough and non-intuitive
• What you typically do is Rewriting instead

Team work is hard

• You've typically optimized the amount of code produced
  • Bus factor remains low
  • In PV168 the thing to optimize is the amount of stuff learned
• In the industry you have to optimize the amount of functionality
  • For really difficult parts it's wise to go in tandem
  • "Doctors never operate alone" (Michael Feathers)
• Camera turned on is a must for on-line cooperation

Copy & Paste can be dangerous

• Unless you know what you're doing
• When using sources such as Stack Overflow, Geeks for Geeks
  • you need to understand the difference in context
  • adapt the proposal to your specific case
  • and get to know the details to be able to defend the solution

Law of the Instrument

If the only tool you have is a hammer, it is tempting to treat
everything as if it were a nail. (Abraham Maslow)

• Especially newly gained tools/techniques tend to be "hammers"
• Not a single thing is ultimately good for everything
  • You always need to think in context

Source Code is Text

• Programming by mouse isn't efficient
  • it's not accurate enough
  • it's not fast enough
  • it's exhausting your mental capacity
• Programming is only a craft
  • not a science neither an art
• Craftsmen have good tools and operate them efficiently
  • keyboard is the ideal tool for programmers
  • IDE is the ideal tool for programmers

Thank you for your hard work!

You've learnt a lot about programming already.